This is why he is remembered as a 'unifier of India'. Patel was considered as the best man for the task of achieving conquest of the princely states by the Indian dominion. Patel persuaded the princes of states by proposing favourable terms for the merger including the creation of privy purses for the rulers' descendants. He did not rule out of force but encouraged the rulers to act out of patriotism.
He had set the deadline of August 15, for all the princely states to sign the instrument of accession document. Besides three princely states- Jammu and Kashmir, Junagadh, and Hyderabad, all others willingly merged with the Indian Union.
Hyderabad was the largest of all princely states and it includes parts of present-day Telangana, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. Junagarh was in Patel's home state of Gujarat. The Nawab of Junagadh had acceded to Pakistan under pressure from Naaz Bhutto but it was located far from Pakistan and its 80 percent population was Hindu.
Junagadh was taken over by India by combining diplomacy with force under the directions of Patel. Hyderabad was also similarly integrated into the Indian Union taken by force under Operation Polo. Patel had insisted that allowing Hyderabad to continue as an independent nation surrounded by India would have not made either Hindus or Muslims in the state feel secure. The project was first announced in and the construction had began in October The Statue of Unity is the world's tallest statue with a height of metres.
It is located on the Narmada River in Kevadiya colony in Gujarat. Take Weekly Tests on app for exam prep and compete with others. Convert to PDF. Pricing Help. All the tools you need to be more productive. Drop Files here Choose File. Enter URL. Please try again later! Please enter the password with the correct permission. How to merge a PDF online? Upload the PDF files you want to merge. Sort your files by dragging and putting them in the order you want them to be merged in.
Sort all documents ascending or descending by using the respective buttons optional. Click on "Save" to open the saving options and again on "Save" to get your merged document. To unify these aspects, we record both the inference rules and their applications in the knowledge base.
In what follows we will be very loose about how long a moment can be and what kinds of activities can occur in a single moment. The inference rules themselves thus become objects of inference, and a process has the potential to derive a theory about itself and to modify its processing as a result of observing its processing.
To that end, we introduce a predicate Applying which would enter into the database if and only if at time , the inference rule which quotes to was applied with the antecedents quoting to to derive the consequent quoting to.
This would itself be encoded as an inference rule; there are various mechanisms that could be employed to avoid an infinite regress. As an example of how these mechanisms work, imagine that at noon an agent begins planning the rest of its day. Among its goals is a non-negotiable need to meet Mrs. Agent at in a location 10 minutes away. Later it might draw conclusions about its own operation that would benefit it in the future.
Table 1 illustrates how this might function for an active logic agent. Table 1: Example of Planning with a Processual Self marginal stripes indicate the duration of individual moments; the entire table is occurring within the process p Timestamp Token Comment Particularly, structures and processes addressing issues of memory, monitoring, and real-time planning will all be needed, for a start.
Table 1 gives only a rough hint of the flow of information-processing required. Indeed, if we are right, then this will amount to building a self, with all the attendant cognitive apparatus that goes along with it. Specifically, we envision two main tasks: A. Hypothesize the ways in which self-constructions are employed in key aspects of cognitive science, and isolate those aspects that lead to a refined version of the hypothesis.
Formulate tests of the hypothesis formal, conceptual, algorithmic, and empirical , and execute those tests. It is our view that a scientifically-understood theory of self can play a major integrative role in the allied cognitive sciences. References Anderson, M. Logic, self-awareness and self improvement. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15, Anderson, M. The roots of self-awareness.
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, Active logic semantics for a single agent in a static world. Artificial Intelligence, 8 , Cox, M. Metareasoning, monitoring, and self-explanation.
Raja Eds. Metareasoning: Thinking about thinking pp. Damasio, A. Self comes to mind. New York: Vintage Books. Elman, J. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14, Grice, P. Philosophical Review 78, Humphrey, N. Seeing red. Janzen, G. The reflexive nature of consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Self-representational approaches to consciousness. Kripke, S. The first person. Kripke, Philosophical Troubles, vol. Min, B. A thalamic reticular networking model of consciousness. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 7 10 , 1— Metzinger, T. Being no one. Newton, N. Emergence and the uniqueness of consciousness.
Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, Perlis, D. Consciousness as self-function. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, Theory and application of self-reference. Bolander, V. Pedersen Eds. Perry, J
0コメント